By Alex Mercer · Updated
cubic vs Codacy
Codacy is a code quality platform: static analysis, style rules, and coverage gates across 49 languages. cubic is an AI reviewer built to catch real bugs in complex codebases, and it learns how your team reviews.
cubic vs Codacy at a glance
| cubic | Codacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Review approach | cubicAI review agents that read each change in the context of the whole codebase. | CodacyStatic analysis and style rules across 49 languages and frameworks, plus an AI Reviewer on Team and Business plans. |
| What it catches | cubicBugs, tech debt, and breaks from your team’s own rules. | CodacyCode quality, style, and security issues. Its AI Reviewer compares the PR description and linked tickets with the diff to flag missing business logic. |
| Your team’s standards | cubicLearns from your senior engineers’ past PR comments and from what your team accepts or dismisses. Add your own rules in plain English. | CodacyCentral quality, security, and coverage standards across teams, with an AI Risk Hub on the Business plan. |
| Pricing | cubicFree for public repositories, with 20 PR reviews a month on the free plan. Paid plans start at $30 per developer a month billed annually, or $40 monthly. | CodacyCodacy pricing |
Used by teams that can’t afford bugs
“I’ve been a dev for 13+ years and I’m still routinely humbled by what cubic catches. We’ve tried other tools but cubic is way better—there’s no comparison.”
- Browser Use85% faster PR mergesAverage time to merge is now about three hours.Read the story →
- Cartography76% faster PR mergesA Linux Foundation project, now merging in about 10.5 hours on average.Read the story →
- Firecrawl70% less time on manual reviewsThe team reviews code 3x faster with cubic.Read the story →
Also used by n8n, Cal.com, Resend, Granola, Legora, Daytona, Tinfoil, and Better Auth. All customer stories
Which is better for your team?
Choose cubic if
- You want an AI reviewer that catches real bugs, not just style issues.
- You want reviews that learn from your senior engineers.
- You want fixes from background agents.
Choose Codacy if
- You want org-wide quality, security, and coverage gates across many languages.
Questions and answers
- What is the difference between cubic and Codacy?
- Codacy is a code quality platform: static analysis, style rules, and coverage gates across 49 languages. cubic is an AI reviewer built to catch real bugs in complex codebases, and it learns how your team reviews.
- Does cubic replace Codacy?
- For AI code review, yes. Codacy’s core is static analysis and org-wide quality gates, which some teams keep alongside cubic on the same pull requests.
- Can cubic scan the whole codebase, like Codacy?
- Yes. cubic scans your whole codebase for bugs and security issues on a schedule you choose, tells the owners, and can fix what it finds with background agents.
- How do I switch from Codacy to cubic?
- Install cubic on the same GitHub repositories and let both review your next few pull requests. Once you’ve seen the difference, turn off Codacy unless you still need its static analysis and quality gates.
- How much does cubic cost compared with Codacy?
- Free for public repositories, with 20 PR reviews a month on the free plan. Paid plans start at $30 per developer a month billed annually, or $40 monthly. Codacy publishes its current prices on its own pricing page, linked in the table above.
- Does cubic store or train on my code?
- No. cubic never stores your code or trains AI on it, and it is SOC 2 compliant.
- How do I try cubic?
- Install the cubic GitHub app and pick your repositories. cubic reviews your next pull request. It’s free for public repositories, and the free plan includes 20 PR reviews a month.
Sources
Checked against each source on Sep 26, 2026.