Updated

Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra

Claude Fable 5.1 (0.88) and GPT-6 Astra (0.95) are statistically tied on Bug Bench.

Claude Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra compared on relative bug rate, by language, and on price and usage.
Claude Fable 5.1GPT-6 Astra
Bug rate
Relative bug rate(statistically tied)0.880.95
Rank#3 of 7#4 of 7
By language
TypeScript(statistically tied)1.051.08
JavaScript1.091.63
Python0.831.18
Go1.270.88
Rust1.340.36
Ruby0.411.25
SQL(statistically tied)1.120.94
Shell(statistically tied)0.690.67
Vue(statistically tied)0.400.69
Terraform(statistically tied)0.820.44
Details
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 4, 2026
List price$10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens$10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens
Share of AI-written code, week of Nov 22.8%4.5%

1.00 = average · lower is better · = statistically tied

More comparisons

Questions and answers

Which has fewer bugs, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
Claude Fable 5.1 (0.88) and GPT-6 Astra (0.95) are statistically tied on Bug Bench. Claude Fable 5.1 ranks #3 of 7 and GPT-6 Astra #4.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
Both list at $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens.
Does it depend on the programming language?
In TypeScript, they were statistically tied (1.05 and 1.08); in JavaScript, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (1.09 vs 1.63); in Python, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (0.83 vs 1.18); in Go, GPT-6 Astra had the lower rate (0.88 vs 1.27); in Rust, GPT-6 Astra had the lower rate (0.36 vs 1.34); in Ruby, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (0.41 vs 1.25); in SQL, they were statistically tied (1.12 and 0.94); in shell scripts, they were statistically tied (0.69 and 0.67); in Vue, they were statistically tied (0.40 and 0.69); in Terraform, they were statistically tied (0.82 and 0.44).
Which is used more, Claude Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra?
GPT-6 Astra, with 4.5% of the AI-written code reviewed by cubic in the week of Nov 2, 2026, against 2.8% for Claude Fable 5.1.