Updated
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna had 68% fewer counted bugs per line than Claude Opus 5.5 (0.45 vs 1.39).
| Claude Opus 5.5 | GPT-6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Bug rate | ||
| Relative bug rate | 1.39 | 0.45 |
| Rank | #7 of 7 | #1 of 7 |
| By language | ||
| TypeScript | 1.25 | 0.73 |
| Details | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| List price | $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens | $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens |
| Share of AI-written code, week of Oct 12 | 59.1% | 1.4% |
1.00 = average · lower is better
More comparisons
Questions and answers
- Which has fewer bugs, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
- GPT-6 Luna had 68% fewer counted bugs per line than Claude Opus 5.5 (0.45 vs 1.39). GPT-6 Luna ranks #1 of 7 and Claude Opus 5.5 #7.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
- Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens; GPT-6 Luna lists at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per 1M tokens. GPT-6 Luna has the lower list price.
- Does it depend on the programming language?
- In TypeScript, GPT-6 Luna had the lower rate (0.73 vs 1.25).
- Which is used more, Claude Opus 5.5 or GPT-6 Luna?
- Claude Opus 5.5, with 59.1% of the AI-written code reviewed by cubic in the week of Oct 12, 2026, against 1.4% for GPT-6 Luna.