Updated
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7
Claude Opus 5.5 had 36% fewer counted bugs per line than Grok 4.7 (1.14 vs 1.79).
| Claude Opus 5.5 | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Bug rate | ||
| Relative bug rate | 1.14 | 1.79 |
| Rank | #5 of 8 | #8 of 8 |
| By coding agent | ||
| Cursor | 2.66 | 1.77 |
| By language | ||
| TypeScript | 1.09 | 1.75 |
| Python(statistically tied) | 0.98 | 1.54 |
| Details | ||
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| List price | $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens | $2 input / $6 output per 1M tokens |
| Share of AI-written code, week of Oct 26 | 64.4% | 1.1% |
1.00 = average · lower is better · = statistically tied
More comparisons
Questions and answers
- Which has fewer bugs, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.7?
- Claude Opus 5.5 had 36% fewer counted bugs per line than Grok 4.7 (1.14 vs 1.79). Claude Opus 5.5 ranks #5 of 8 and Grok 4.7 #8.
- Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.7?
- Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 input / $6 output per 1M tokens. Grok 4.7 has the lower list price.
- Does it depend on the programming language?
- In TypeScript, Claude Opus 5.5 had the lower rate (1.09 vs 1.75); in Python, they were statistically tied (0.98 and 1.54).
- Which is used more, Claude Opus 5.5 or Grok 4.7?
- Claude Opus 5.5, with 64.4% of the AI-written code reviewed by cubic in the week of Oct 26, 2026, against 1.1% for Grok 4.7.