Updated

Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Fable 5.1 had 21% fewer counted bugs per line than Claude Opus 5.5 (0.88 vs 1.11).

Claude Fable 5.1 and Claude Opus 5.5 compared on relative bug rate, by coding agent and language, and on price and usage.
Claude Fable 5.1Claude Opus 5.5
Bug rate
Relative bug rate0.881.11
Rank#3 of 7#6 of 7
By coding agent
Claude Code0.881.09
By language
TypeScript(statistically tied)1.051.02
JavaScript(statistically tied)1.091.28
Python0.831.01
Go(statistically tied)1.271.22
Rust(statistically tied)1.341.19
Ruby0.410.98
PHP2.530.82
SQL(statistically tied)1.120.73
Shell(statistically tied)0.691.01
Vue0.401.39
Terraform(statistically tied)0.820.94
Details
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
ReleasedSep 1, 2026Sep 22, 2026
List price$10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens$4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens
Share of AI-written code, week of Nov 22.8%66.2%

1.00 = average · lower is better · = statistically tied

More comparisons

Questions and answers

Which has fewer bugs, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Fable 5.1 had 21% fewer counted bugs per line than Claude Opus 5.5 (0.88 vs 1.11). Claude Fable 5.1 ranks #3 of 7 and Claude Opus 5.5 #6.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Fable 5.1 lists at $10 input / $50 output per 1M tokens; Claude Opus 5.5 lists at $4 input / $20 output per 1M tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 has the lower list price.
Does it depend on the programming language?
In TypeScript, they were statistically tied (1.05 and 1.02); in JavaScript, they were statistically tied (1.09 and 1.28); in Python, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (0.83 vs 1.01); in Go, they were statistically tied (1.27 and 1.22); in Rust, they were statistically tied (1.34 and 1.19); in Ruby, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (0.41 vs 0.98); in PHP, Claude Opus 5.5 had the lower rate (0.82 vs 2.53); in SQL, they were statistically tied (1.12 and 0.73); in shell scripts, they were statistically tied (0.69 and 1.01); in Vue, Claude Fable 5.1 had the lower rate (0.40 vs 1.39); in Terraform, they were statistically tied (0.82 and 0.94).
Which is used more, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 5.5?
Claude Opus 5.5, with 66.2% of the AI-written code reviewed by cubic in the week of Nov 2, 2026, against 2.8% for Claude Fable 5.1.